Black Policing Charters

Black Policing Charters are locally developed, community-owned accountability instruments. They give Black communities a practical way to define what fair and accountable policing should look like in their area and to test whether public commitments lead to change.
The Alliance for Police Accountability provides the Policing Accountability Framework, facilitation and shared standards. Local communities decide the Charter's priorities, language and mandate. A Charter is not written for a place by the APA or by the institutions it is intended to scrutinise.
01
What a Charter does
A Black Policing Charter turns community knowledge and collective priorities into a basis for sustained scrutiny. It can set out the standards communities expect, the evidence needed to assess them, the commitments made by responsible institutions and how progress will be reviewed and reported.
Each Charter is rooted in its local context. It reflects the area's history, experiences of policing, public-safety concerns, institutions and routes for democratic accountability.
02
From community experience to public accountability
01
Build shared knowledge
Communities consider lived experience alongside local history, rights, official data and policing commitments. This creates a shared evidence base without treating personal testimony as something to be extracted and forgotten.
02
Establish a mandate
A Popular Assembly or another agreed local democratic process enables people to deliberate, identify priorities and establish the mandate on which the Charter is based.
03
Define local standards
The community's priorities are translated into clear expectations, evidence questions and arrangements for review. The Charter is then agreed through the local process rather than adopted as a national template.
04
Monitor and report
A Community Police Monitoring Group can gather evidence, track responses and report back between assemblies, helping the Charter remain active after its launch.
03
Shared principles
Local Charters will differ, but the Policing Accountability Framework sets common safeguards for credible community-led scrutiny:
a clear democratic mandate and local ownership;
independence from the institutions being scrutinised;
inclusive, accessible and trauma-informed participation;
careful use of evidence, with fact, testimony, analysis and allegation treated distinctly;
transparent governance, conflicts of interest and funding relationships;
fair processes, including an opportunity for institutions to respond;
regular public reporting and renewal of the community mandate.
04
Local Charters
Birmingham is the first place putting the APA's framework into practice. Charters in Cardiff, Hackney, Haringey, Lambeth and Manchester are works in progress, and further local Charter pages will be added as communities begin their own locally led processes.
01
Birmingham
The Birmingham Black Policing Charter process began publicly in April 2026. Birmingham communities will determine the content and priorities of their Charter through the local process.
Explore the Birmingham Charter02
Cardiff
The Cardiff Black Policing Charter is a work in progress. Get in touch if you would like to help shape it.
Explore the Cardiff Charter03
Hackney
The Hackney Black Policing Charter is a work in progress. Get in touch if you would like to help shape it.
Explore the Hackney Charter04
Haringey
The Haringey Black Policing Charter is a work in progress. Get in touch if you would like to help shape it.
Explore the Haringey Charter05
Lambeth
The Lambeth Black Policing Charter is a work in progress. Get in touch if you would like to help shape it.
Explore the Lambeth Charter06
Manchester
The Manchester Black Policing Charter is a work in progress. Get in touch if you would like to help shape it.
Explore the Manchester Charter05
What a Charter is not
A Charter does not replace the courts, the Independent Office for Police Conduct, His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services, professional standards procedures or elected policing governance. It adds an independent community-led route for examining patterns, assessing institutional responses and requiring public answers.
It is not an individual complaints service and does not create legal enforcement powers. Its authority comes from a transparent community mandate, credible evidence and sustained public scrutiny.
Read about the wider accountability model